<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Different ways an open-source project can make some money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/09/25/different-ways-an-open-source-project-can-make-some-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/09/25/different-ways-an-open-source-project-can-make-some-money/</link>
	<description>baking cakes with CakePHP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ThinkingPHP and beyond &#187; Digg.com, Open Source, Intellectual Property, ThinkingPHP.org</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/09/25/different-ways-an-open-source-project-can-make-some-money/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkingPHP and beyond &#187; Digg.com, Open Source, Intellectual Property, ThinkingPHP.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/09/25/different-ways-an-open-source-project-can-make-some-money/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>[...] About the article itself: Some people have pointed out that it actually only contains 3 ways of making money and 2 ways to aid the process. I realized that while typing as well, but hey a list of 5 sounded better for the digg.com crowd then a list of 3,- I appoligize for this misleading information ; ). Another group of people called all of the ideas lame and stupid, while some other&#8217;s expressed that they found them informative. But what really caught my eye were the comments about open source in general, which brings me to the next point: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About the article itself: Some people have pointed out that it actually only contains 3 ways of making money and 2 ways to aid the process. I realized that while typing as well, but hey a list of 5 sounded better for the digg.com crowd then a list of 3,- I appoligize for this misleading information ; ). Another group of people called all of the ideas lame and stupid, while some other&#8217;s expressed that they found them informative. But what really caught my eye were the comments about open source in general, which brings me to the next point: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
