<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baking a Cake &#8211; Domain model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/</link>
	<description>baking cakes with CakePHP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/comment-page-1/#comment-97032</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/#comment-97032</guid>
		<description>@Aeshan: Hm, I don&#039;t understand your question, what do you mean with &quot;full routine&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aeshan: Hm, I don&#8217;t understand your question, what do you mean with &#8220;full routine&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeshan</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/comment-page-1/#comment-97010</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/#comment-97010</guid>
		<description>Hi Max,
I&#039;ve been scouring the web looking for UML I could use in Web Projects.yours looks like a good candidate.tho I was wondering if what the full routine would be like from user requirements to release?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Max,<br />
I&#8217;ve been scouring the web looking for UML I could use in Web Projects.yours looks like a good candidate.tho I was wondering if what the full routine would be like from user requirements to release?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your feedback. 

@Max: The reason for the small steps is, as shuron already said, that they cover different topics. But I agree with you that the first two posts could have been combined in one post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback. </p>
<p>@Max: The reason for the small steps is, as shuron already said, that they cover different topics. But I agree with you that the first two posts could have been combined in one post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuron</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>shuron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>No i think stepps are well sized encapsulating separate topics of the project</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No i think stepps are well sized encapsulating separate topics of the project</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4338</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2007/02/10/baking-a-cake-domain-model/#comment-4338</guid>
		<description>Good going Man, But one joint bigger posts will be better than these small steps :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good going Man, But one joint bigger posts will be better than these small steps :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

