Comments on: Book review: Practical CakePHP Projects

By: cakebaker

cakebaker — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:00:48 +0000

@JJJ: Yes, the code for the first chapter is missing, though I’m not sure whether it would be that helpful, as there is no coherent example in that chapter.

@plainsdude: Yes, I agree, and I wouldn’t recommend this book for people who are new to CakePHP.

By: plainsdude

plainsdude — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:39:31 +0000

The book is pretty terrible. I mean the chapter 2 example doesn’t even work (watts covered this – add_or_edit.ctp ??). Pretty terrible way to introduce someone new to CakePHP.

By: JJJ

JJJ — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:52:32 +0000

There is no source code for the first chapter – a place where you would imagine a good start is required.

Elsewhere code is just thrown out here and there and there is very poor explaining as for what goes where.

By: cakebaker

cakebaker — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:00:46 +0000

@jamc: I'm not sure I understand your comment correctly (I had to use Google translate as I don't speak Spanish), but right now I don't recommend any CakePHP book as all (English) books are outdated... Probably the best thing you can do to learn CakePHp is to use the API and the cookbook, and to ask questions in the IRC channel or the Google group (there is also a Spanish group)

By: jamc

jamc — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:15:52 +0000

Si tienes razón este libro nunca fue pensado en el lector. desde el primer ejemplo de e-commerce no se lo puede seguir.

Aparte que como ya lo dijiste el tine mucho código “incorrecto”. ahora lo estoy leyendo pero me encuentro fustrado ya que pense que estaba mejor y lo peor es que no hay otro libro parecido.. Del otro lada cakePHP application development de Packt. Pub. me gusto mucho…

By: cakebaker

cakebaker — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:22:14 +0000

@Watts: Yes, such things are annoying…

By: Watts

Watts — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:39:29 +0000

I picked up this book, too, and I’m terribly annoyed with it. In addition to the problems you mentioned, the technical editing in it is terrible. In Chapter 2, for instance, it tells you about the ‘add_or_edit’ element for adding/editing posts, but it doesn’t actually give you that element. Listing 2-6 is for an add view that… doesn’t use the add_or_edit element. If you follow along with the text, you won’t be able to create the sample application.

There are other typos I’ve caught, including in code. I bought the book in the hopes that it would teach me stuff I didn’t know — but I can recognize such grievous errors in the stuff I do know that I’m just not sure I can trust it to get things more complex right.

By: cakebaker

cakebaker — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:27:49 +0000

@Martin: ;-)

By: Steve Oliveira » Blog Archive » CakePHP books - Just another WordPress weblog (I’m fine with this tagline)

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:32:05 +0000

[...] Daniel Hofstetter has just recently reviewed Practical CakePHP Projects. Check it [...]

By: Martin Westin

Martin Westin — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:14:00 +0000

page 7:
“The controller should contain most of the business logic”