<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Git workflow for single developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/</link>
	<description>baking cakes with CakePHP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-144262</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-144262</guid>
		<description>@primeminister: Yep, you can always clone the bare repo. And yes, you won&#039;t lose any code as long as the bare repo remains intact (though you will lose all changes not pushed to the server if your local machine crashes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@primeminister: Yep, you can always clone the bare repo. And yes, you won&#8217;t lose any code as long as the bare repo remains intact (though you will lose all changes not pushed to the server if your local machine crashes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: primeminister</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-144222</link>
		<dc:creator>primeminister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-144222</guid>
		<description>When I loose my local repo I can always make a new one and pull from the bare repo, right? So I never loose code if the bare remains intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I loose my local repo I can always make a new one and pull from the bare repo, right? So I never loose code if the bare remains intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-143411</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-143411</guid>
		<description>@Max: Thanks for your comment!

What I described here is only one possible workflow to give you an idea of how such a workflow could look like. You can find other workflows in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://progit.org/book/ch5-1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pro Git book&lt;/a&gt;. In the end you have to find the workflow that fits to you/your team. 

Personally, I can only recommend to use Git, even if you are a single developer. And I can&#039;t imagine to go back to Subversion.

Anyway, give it a try, and don&#039;t get discouraged by this article ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Max: Thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>What I described here is only one possible workflow to give you an idea of how such a workflow could look like. You can find other workflows in the <a href="http://progit.org/book/ch5-1.html" rel="nofollow">Pro Git book</a>. In the end you have to find the workflow that fits to you/your team. </p>
<p>Personally, I can only recommend to use Git, even if you are a single developer. And I can&#8217;t imagine to go back to Subversion.</p>
<p>Anyway, give it a try, and don&#8217;t get discouraged by this article ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-143390</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-143390</guid>
		<description>Well... I have to say that without this tutorial, git would&#039;ve taken me another 10 or 12 hours to figure out.  Thanks for the input -- it worked fine... eventually.

After having gone through that ordeal I&#039;m convinced that git just isn&#039;t suited to individual development or small teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; I have to say that without this tutorial, git would&#8217;ve taken me another 10 or 12 hours to figure out.  Thanks for the input &#8212; it worked fine&#8230; eventually.</p>
<p>After having gone through that ordeal I&#8217;m convinced that git just isn&#8217;t suited to individual development or small teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-129128</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-129128</guid>
		<description>@omarish: You are welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@omarish: You are welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omarish</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-128968</link>
		<dc:creator>omarish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-128968</guid>
		<description>I love it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz L</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-128389</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-128389</guid>
		<description>@Nate: Yep, I agree with you. I usually have a &quot;live&quot; branch on my local repo, where I merge changes and do other pre-launch processes. Then I push to the live repo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nate: Yep, I agree with you. I usually have a &#8220;live&#8221; branch on my local repo, where I merge changes and do other pre-launch processes. Then I push to the live repo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-125582</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-125582</guid>
		<description>@othmane: Thanks for your comment!

Yes, I&#039;m using dreamhost. Though I don&#039;t have any experience with webdav and multi-dev Git setups... Stupid question: couldn&#039;t you just give everyone in your team ssh access, and the problem would disappear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@othmane: Thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m using dreamhost. Though I don&#8217;t have any experience with webdav and multi-dev Git setups&#8230; Stupid question: couldn&#8217;t you just give everyone in your team ssh access, and the problem would disappear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: othmane ouahbi</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-125293</link>
		<dc:creator>othmane ouahbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-125293</guid>
		<description>that certainly works for one single  dev.

though, I won&#039;t name the bare repo &quot;bare&quot; to avoid confusion ( maybe hub? central? or something meaningful ), but again this is only for a single dev so who cares.

hmm, are you on dreamhost ?

the reason I ask is that I have a domain I  want to use to host repos for the internal team, and they don&#039;t necessarly have ssh access.
so webdav wasn&#039;t a choice. ended up working but since repo folder is no longer owned by the shell user, I can&#039;t chmod +x post-update and thus the automation isn&#039;t working.
I&#039;ll see if I can install gitosis :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that certainly works for one single  dev.</p>
<p>though, I won&#8217;t name the bare repo &#8220;bare&#8221; to avoid confusion ( maybe hub? central? or something meaningful ), but again this is only for a single dev so who cares.</p>
<p>hmm, are you on dreamhost ?</p>
<p>the reason I ask is that I have a domain I  want to use to host repos for the internal team, and they don&#8217;t necessarly have ssh access.<br />
so webdav wasn&#8217;t a choice. ended up working but since repo folder is no longer owned by the shell user, I can&#8217;t chmod +x post-update and thus the automation isn&#8217;t working.<br />
I&#8217;ll see if I can install gitosis :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakebaker</title>
		<link>http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2009/03/08/a-git-workflow-for-single-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-124868</link>
		<dc:creator>cakebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cakebaker.42dh.com/?p=1133#comment-124868</guid>
		<description>@Eoin: You are welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eoin: You are welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
